Some see, few know, many choose to wander aimlessly in a fog, devoid of sunlight. I seek the light of day and leave the others to their chosen realm of ignorance. They are the ones who have brought this great nation down. I write only for the benefit of those who possess the courage required to restore our birthright.

Thursday, October 30, 2014


Two years ago during the last Presidential election we read of voting machines misbehaving and turning Republican votes to Democrat votes before the voter's eyes. Again this is occurring and we are being told that the machines need to be re-calibrated. Something, my friends, is terribly wrong with our voting machines but it is not quite what people think. The fact of the matter is that the situation is far more diabolical than meets the eye. Hint ... Big Brother is laughing. Continue reading and I shall explain that cryptic remark...

I have not written a computer program in years now but I could still write one that would flip any vote allowing a designated person or party to win an election. But then I was an amateur writing only programs for my own business. Let us hear from a professional who is well versed in the political arena as well as programming. About a minute into the video he tells us that he could write a program that would guarantee a 51% win vs 49% loss that none could detect.

Fifty one percent...That sounds awfully familiar:

Bloomberg ... January 4, 2013
Final Tally Shows Obama First Since ’56 to Win 51% Twice
Barack Obama is the first president in more than five decades to win at least 51 percent of the national popular vote twice, according to a revised vote count in New York eight weeks after the Nov. 6 election.

Short of writing a lot of code that would only cause confusion I shall explain, as simply as possible, the logic behind such a program.

Not wanting all voting machines to behave exactly the same and arouse suspicion, a random element must be generated on each; actually it would be far better with two such elements. Every computer is capable of generating random numbers within stated parameters. Not wanting a landslide of votes as that would naturally be suspect, a slight win is far more desirable, thus we aim at the 51% bracket.

My program, were I to write it, would generate a random number not less than 51 nor more than 53. Then it would generate a second random number not less than 1 nor more than ninety nine. It would then multiply the second number by .01. Let us assume that the first random number is 51 and the second is 35. This would give us a win factor goal of 51.35 percent to 48.65 percent assuming that only two names were on the ballot. Other names would only complicate things mildly as their tally would be deducted from the loser's 48.65. Irregardless, the chosen candidate would win with the guaranteed 51.35. Other machines with different random numbers would behave the same with winning numbers between 51.1 through 53.99. This how it was done and how it will be done in this next election.

It is enough that the people know there was an election. The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything.
Joseph Stalin

And old Joe didn't even have our programmable voting machines.

In a program votes would be stored in string arrays and every vote for the winning Democrat would be added to the D array. As long as the winner to be has at least the figure from above of 51.35 percent the subsequent votes would be processed without interdiction with the R array getting all of the Republican votes and the I array the Independent ones. The vote flip occurs only when the value of the combined R and I arrays exceed 48.65 percent. From that point all R votes are converted to D votes until the Democrat once again has at least the assigned 51.35 percent.

Sometimes in the world of politics you win by losing, as is expected in this coming election. The administration actually wants to lose some seats in the 2014 election. Allowing conservatives to savor a false victory will keep leading them on. Consequently not all machines will be programmed to guarantee a win for the Democratic nominee. Some, will indeed count the votes as they come in and award the seat to the latest RINO chosen by the GOP.

But, whether a Democrat or RINO, Obama knows that he will have the support he seeks. The RINOs will argue, bicker, make defiant speeches, and cry great alligator tears; then they will cave, and Obama will invite a few to a round of golf.

Above I told you that Big Brother is laughing, and you have no idea just how hard. In 2012 and now in 2014 we have heard of the vote being changed right before the voter's eyes. He votes R and the vote is magically changed to D. That is the sound of Big Brother. Hysterical!

Any programmer worth his salt can change the vote tally as per his computer code and it will not show up on the video display, and none would be the wiser. The mere fact that it does simply shows that the programmer has a warped sense of humor and that he and Big Brother are showing you that you do not matter. They can flip the vote anytime and anyway they so choose, just like uncle Joe Stalin. And with all of the audacity of Stalin they dare show you their control, knowing that you can do nothing but complain.

In 139 BC Rome held the first election using paper ballots. The practice was carried down through the centuries and in our early days this nation continued the tried and true practice. With paper ballots, if there is any doubt of the outcome, a recount can be demanded to resolve any questions. The paper ballot is time consuming and cumbersome but the only reliable way to hold an election.

We abandoned that practice as Americans seek instant gratification and are far too inclined to trust corrupt leaders and technology that can be tweaked to provide erroneous results. That sad day was a turning point that has over time led us to our present state of decadence. I am not advocating a return to paper ballots as I have become convinced that 2014 will be our last faux election. All talk of 2016 is just part of the narrative to string us along.

My most recent essay Golfing Across The Rubicon took several days to write as it was so depressing, and if I did not believe every word that I wrote I would not have published it at all. Without fail I hope that I am wrong every time I take to my keyboard. Sadly, I am not wrong, and today a friend posted predictions by Rush Limbaugh saying much the same that I had. The major difference in his views and mine is that I project major executive action from Obama immediately following the election and he believes that January will be the time when push comes to shove.

Rush warned "And he’s gonna go, I think, at NASCAR break-neck speeds." while I wrote "The old expression 'pedal to the metal' is about to become the prime directive of the Obama administration." 

“As far as Barack Obama is concerned, he doesn’t care who wins the Senate,” Limbaugh said on his national broadcast Tuesday. “When it’s all said and done, it isn’t gonna change what he’s doing. I think everybody ought to buckle up for Obama in these last two years.” and In my essay I wrote "Sensible Americans have been terrified at the massive power grabs that have taken place in the last six years, but those power grabs have only been setting the stage. The coming two years is when you will see the plan truly shaping up as America is finally brought to her knees, and that power over our people becomes absolute."

Rush Limbaugh and I have very different styles and delivery, but our understanding of the progressive agenda and our nation's likely future run quite parallel. Both he and I offer the same advice...Prepare!

Suggested Reading...
Golfing Across The Rubicon
You Can't Fix Stupid
Americans Want Communism Part Four

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please stay on topic. Be polite.